AppSecure and Pentestly both centre their offer on offensive security expertise. The useful distinction is how each engagement is staffed, how technology supports testing, and how your team works with findings after discovery.
This is an independent comparison based on public information, not a paid ranking. Features and terms can change; confirm them directly with each provider.
Consider Pentestly when you want an in-house UK delivery team, bespoke AI testing agents working alongside human testers, and a managed portal spanning scope, live findings, remediation and retest. Consider AppSecure when its hacker-led delivery model and published service packages better match your buying process.
AppSecure's public website positions the company around hacker-led penetration testing and red teaming, certified security engineers, compliance-ready reports and expert revalidation. Its pricing page presents packaged scopes for common asset types.
Source reviewed: AppSecure pricing and service overview| Decision area | AppSecure | Pentestly |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery model | Publicly positioned as hacker-led testing by certified security engineers. | In-house testers work with bespoke AI testing agents; a named human owns every conclusion. |
| Use of AI | AI security testing is listed as a specialist test type on the public service catalogue. | AI augmentation is part of the core delivery method, used to broaden exploration and assist validation. |
| Commercial model | Published packages define inclusions for common penetration-test scopes. | A scoped proposal is built around assets, objectives, dependencies, effort and engagement schedules. |
| Client workflow | Public materials highlight reports, support and revalidation. | The client portal joins proposals, projects, live findings, comments, remediation status and reports. |
| Best question to ask | Who will be assigned, and how does that team stay consistent across repeat tests? | Which AI-assisted techniques apply to this scope, and how will the tester verify their output? |
Both provide penetration testing and red-team services, but their operating models and buyer experience differ. Pentestly explicitly combines in-house human testing, bespoke AI agents and a managed delivery portal.
Yes. At Pentestly, AI expands exploration and assists the tester; it does not replace human-led business-logic testing, exploit validation, risk judgement or report ownership.
Compare named delivery ownership, tester experience relevant to your stack, exact in-scope assets, test depth, reporting milestones, retest terms, data handling and what happens when the scope changes.
Speak directly with the team that will scope and deliver your engagement. Clear boundaries, practical answers and no sales runaround.